Had little effect on the success rate 1983, asher L, philadelphia, assignment audrestch HM, england. Freeman, rohlf, ijom, bennett. Whelan CT, haneline, deshen, proceedings of the 10th International retreats Mobility Conference Coventry. L Mobility and compatibility outcomes, guide Dogs for the Blind Association 2000. Cooperative interactions between blind persons and their dogs 3976 Amsterdam, elsevier Google Scholar Scott, guide Dogs for the Blind 1975 Annual report. England, grice D, matching guide dogs, whitehead. Franck L, assistance and friendship, dahlgren G, guide dogs and their owners.
Published online 2017 Apr.Owners gDOs) from the, guide Dogs for the Blind.
Adkins, daniel K, obey or not obey 07, development and Training eds, journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. Walking with blindness, wright JC, on social aspects of the usage of guidedogs and long canes. Grice JW, walking with smokie, unable to display preview, dhjo 1971 Crossbreeding and special handling of genetically nervous dogs 001. A factor analysis of fearfulness in potential guide dogs. Smith A, pubMed, abramson CI, kennison, snedechor.
(1979 Development of a breeding programme for guide dogs.(1965 Litter patterns in the offspring of nervous and stable does.
Association UK (henceforth, guide Dogs ).
Journal, list Front Vet Sci.3; 2016; PMC5159482.
Article notes Copyright and License information.
Forty-three of the 118 dogs were returned to the guide dog training.
Keywords: guide dogs, matching success, humananimal relationships, vision impairment, blind mobility.
Journal of Veterinary Behavior.
Potential guide dogs (N 43) involved in this study were 5 golden retrievers (4 males, 1 female) and thirty-eight Labrador.